A Comparative Analysis of Genetic Algorithm Replacement Strategies in a Real-World Optimization Problem: An Elitism and Diversity Oriented Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64470/elene.2025.1002

Keywords:

Genetic Algorithm, Replacement Strategy, Elitism, Diversity, Selective Harmonic Elimination, Multilevel Inverter

Abstract

In this study, generation replacement strategies used in genetic algorithms are comparatively analysed in the context of a real-world optimization problem, with a focus on the balance between elitism and diversity. The problem under consideration involves solving the equations of the Selective Harmonic Elimination (SHE) method, which is widely used for controlling Multilevel Inverters (MLIs). Six algorithms, each employing a different replacement mechanism, were tested under four distinct scenarios composed of various population sizes and iteration counts. The results were evaluated using fundamental statistical metrics, boxplots, and convergence curves. The findings reveal that elitist strategies perform better in large-population, long-duration scenarios, whereas approaches prioritizing diversity yield more effective results under limited resource conditions. This study systematically demonstrates the impact of different replacement strategies on optimization performance and offers valuable insights for strategy selection in real-world optimization problems

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahn, C. W., & Ramakrishna, R. S. (2003). Elitism-based compact genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 7(4), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2003.814633

Alhijawi, B., & Awajan, A. (2024). Genetic algorithms: Theory, genetic operators, solutions, and applications. Evolutionary Intelligence, 17(3), 1245–1256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-023-00822-6

Ali, K. B., Telmoudi, A. J., & Gattoufi, S. (2020). Improved Genetic Algorithm Approach Based on New Virtual Crossover Operators for Dynamic Job Shop Scheduling. IEEE Access, 8, 213318–213329. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3040345

Bakirtzis, A. G., Biskas, P. N., Zoumas, C. E., & Petridis, V. (2002). Optimal power flow by enhanced genetic algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 17(2), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2002.1007886

Bektaş, Y., Karaca, H., Taha, T. A., & Zaynal, H. I. (2023). Red deer algorithm-based selective harmonic elimination technique for multilevel inverters. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 12(5), 2643–2650. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v12i5.5160

Bertin, T., Despesse, G., & Thomas, R. (2023). Comparison between a Cascaded H-Bridge and a Conventional H-Bridge for a 5-kW Grid-Tied Solar Inverter. Electronics, 12(8), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12081929

Brouwer, N., Dijkzeul, D., Koppenhol, L., Pijning, I., & van den Berg, D. (2022). Survivor selection in a crossoverless evolutionary algorithm. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, 1631–1639. https://doi.org/10.1145/3520304.3533950

Dahidah, M. S. A., Konstantinou, G., & Agelidis, V. G. (2015). A Review of Multilevel Selective Harmonic Elimination PWM: Formulations, Solving Algorithms, Implementation and Applications. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 30(8), 4091–4106. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2014.2355226

Disney, S. M., Naim, M. M., & Towill, D. R. (2000). Genetic algorithm optimisation of a class of inventory control systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 68(3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00101-2

Du, H., Wang, Z., Zhan, W., & Guo, J. (2018). Elitism and Distance Strategy for Selection of Evolutionary Algorithms. IEEE Access, 6, 44531–44541. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2861760

El-Hosainy, A., Hamed, H. A., Azazi, Haitham. Z., & El-Kholy, E. E. (2017). A review of multilevel inverter topologies, control techniques, and applications. 2017 Nineteenth International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON), 1265–1275. https://doi.org/10.1109/MEPCON.2017.8301344

Gen, M., & Cheng, R. (1999). Genetic Algorithms and Engineering Optimization. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172261

Halim, Z., Yousaf, M. N., Waqas, M., Sulaiman, M., Abbas, G., Hussain, M., Ahmad, I., & Hanif, M. (2021). An effective genetic algorithm-based feature selection method for intrusion detection systems. Computers & Security, 110, 102448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102448

Hassanat, A., Almohammadi, K., Alkafaween, E., Abunawas, E., Hammouri, A., & Prasath, V. B. S. (2019). Choosing Mutation and Crossover Ratios for Genetic Algorithms—A Review with a New Dynamic Approach. Information, 10(12), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10120390

Holland, J. H. (1992). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence (5th ed.). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001

Hong, T.-P., Wang, H.-S., Lin, W.-Y., & Lee, W.-Y. (2002). Evolution of Appropriate Crossover and Mutation Operators in a Genetic Process. Applied Intelligence, 16(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012815625611

Katoch, S., Chauhan, S. S., & Kumar, V. (2021). A review on genetic algorithm: Past, present, and future. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(5), 8091–8126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10139-6

Kim, K., & Han, I. (2000). Genetic algorithms approach to feature discretization in artificial neural networks for the prediction of stock price index. Expert Systems with Applications, 19(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(00)00027-0

Lingom, P. M., Song-Manguelle, J., Nyobe-Yome, J. M., & Doumbia, M. L. (2024). A Comprehensive Review of Compensation Control Techniques Suitable for Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverter Operation with Unequal DC Sources or Faulty Cells. Energies, 17(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17030722

Osman, M. S., Abo-Sinna, M. A., & Mousa, A. A. (2004). A solution to the optimal power flow using genetic algorithm. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 155(2), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(03)00785-9

Smith, M. G., & Bull, L. (2005). Genetic Programming with a Genetic Algorithm for Feature Construction and Selection. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 6(3), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10710-005-2988-7

Sunddararaj, S. P., Srinivasarangan, S. R., & Nallusamy, S. (2020). An Extensive Review of Multilevel Inverters Based on Their Multifaceted Structural Configuration, Triggering Methods and Applications. Electronics, 9(3), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9030433

Yang, K., Zhang, Q., Zhang, J., Yuan, R., Guan, Q., Yu, W., & Wang, J. (2017). Unified Selective Harmonic Elimination for Multilevel Converters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 32(2), 1579–1590. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2016.2548080

Zhang, F., Cao, X., & Yang, D. (2008). Intelligent scheduling of public traffic vehicles based on a hybrid genetic algorithm. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 13(5), 625–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70103-2

Zhang, J., Zhuang, J., Du, H., & Wang, S. (2009). Self-organizing genetic algorithm based tuning of PID controllers. Information Sciences, 179(7), 1007–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2008.11.038

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Doğan, H. (2025). A Comparative Analysis of Genetic Algorithm Replacement Strategies in a Real-World Optimization Problem: An Elitism and Diversity Oriented Perspective. Electrical Engineering and Energy, 4(1), 11-32. https://doi.org/10.64470/elene.2025.1002