Bankability Assessment of Lithium-ion and Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries in Kenyan Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64470/elene.2026.36Keywords:
Bankability gap, Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (HRES), Lithium-ion (Li-ion), Vanadium Redox Flow Battery (VRFB)Abstract
Reliable and affordable electricity remains essential for rural development; however, in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), particularly Kenya, the major barrier to scalable rural electrification is increasingly the bankability gap, where technically feasible Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems (HRES) fail to attract sustainable investment. This study evaluates how battery storage technology selection influences investment viability by comparing lithium-ion (Li-ion) and vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB) systems in a rural Kenyan HRES. An integrated framework combining Homer Pro optimization, project-level financial modelling, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and AHP-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) was applied to assess techno-economic performance, environmental sustainability, and investor attractiveness. Results show that Li-ion systems achieve stronger short-term financial bankability, with lower Levelized Cost of Storage (LCOS) of KSh 23.17/kWh compared to KSh 28.32/kWh for VRFB systems, alongside higher baseline Investor Attractiveness Index (IAI). However, Li-ion technologies exhibit higher lifecycle environmental burden and replacement risk. In contrast, VRFB systems demonstrate lower emissions, longer operational lifetime, and stronger suitability under concessional and sustainability-oriented financing structures. Sensitivity analysis reveals that battery bankability depends not only on technical performance but also on financing structure, discount rate, and investor class.
Downloads
References
Devarajan, Y., Thandavamoorthy, R., Thatoi, D. N., Jangid, P. K., Manjunath, H. R., Zalawadia, J., ... & Mehar, K. (2026). Advancing SDG-7 for affordable and clean energy: decentralized energy access pathways, policy–finance barriers, and AI-enabled transition strategies. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 45(1), 2620883. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2026.2620883
Gupta, A., & Suhag, S. (2022). Evaluation of energy storage systems for sustainable development of renewable energy systems—A comprehensive review. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0075623
Bui, M. T., & Le, T. H. (2026). Can international financial assistance drive the clean energy transition in developing countries? Green Finance, 8(2), 214-235. https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2026008
Hou, Z., Chen, X., Liu, J., Huang, Z., Chen, Y., Zhou, M., ... & Zhou, H. (2024). Towards a high efficiency and low-cost aqueous redox flow battery: A short review. Journal of Power Sources, 601, 234242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234242
Bhattacharyya, R. (2024). Statistical Analysis of Levelized Round Trip Cost of Grid Scale Electrical Energy Storage in Batteries with Different Chemistries. Archives of Advanced Engineering Science, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewAAES42024217
World Bank. (2024). Kenya Off-Grid Solar Access Project (KOSAP). https://projects.worldbank.org/en/projects-operations/project-detail/P160009
Ahmed, S., & D’Angola, A. (2025). Energy storage systems: Scope, technologies, characteristics, progress, challenges, and future suggestions—Renewable energy community perspectives. Energies, 18(11), 2679. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18112679
Ahmad, F., Boumaiza, A., Yazici, M., Taşaltın, N., & Özmen, S. (2026). From Global Mapping to Local Action: Green Finance, Regulatory Frameworks, and Policy Transformation for Sustainable Energy Transition in Qatar and Türkiye. Sustainable Development, 34(2), 1648-1684. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70373
Hemmati, M., Bayati, N., & Ebel, T. (2024). Life cycle assessment and costing of large-scale battery energy storage integration in Lombok’s power grid. Batteries, 10(8), 295. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10080295
Boumaiza, A., Sanfilippo, A., & Mohandes, N. (2022). Modeling multi-criteria decision analysis in residential PV adoption. Energy Strategy Reviews, 39, 100789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100789
Muchiri, K., Kamau, J. N., Wekesa, D. W., Saoke, C. O., Mutuku, J. N., & Gathua, J. K. (2023). Wind and solar resource complementarity and its viability in wind/PV hybrid energy systems in Machakos, Kenya. Scientific African, 20, e01599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01599
Digkoglou, P., Tsoukias, A., Papathanasiou, J., & Gotzamani, K. (2024). A Meta-analysis of the review literature on multiple-criteria decision aids for environmental issues. Applied Sciences, 14(23), 10862. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142310862
Elliot, J., Brown, J., Mlilo, N., & Bowtell, L. (2025). Global Trends in Community Energy Storage: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Current and Future Direction. Sustainability, 17(5), 1975. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17051975
Kenya Meteorological Department. (2020). Kenya Solar Radiation Atlas: Assessment of Solar Resource Potential Across Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya: KMD, Ministry of Environment and Forestry.
Olabi, A. G., Allam, M. A., Abdelkareem, M. A., Deepa, T. D., Alami, A. H., Abbas, Q., ... & Sayed, E. T. (2023). Redox flow batteries: recent development in main components, emerging technologies, diagnostic techniques, large-scale applications, and challenges and barriers. Batteries, 9(8), 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9080409
Thango, B. A., & Obokoh, L. (2024). Techno-economic analysis of hybrid renewable energy systems for power interruptions: A systematic review. Eng, 5(3), 2108-2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/eng5030112
Zanoletti, A., Carena, E., Ferrara, C., & Bontempi, E. (2024). A review of lithium-ion battery recycling: technologies, sustainability, and open issues. Batteries, 10(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10010038
Zeng, L. (2025). Techno-economic analysis for lithium-ion battery manufacturing and recycling. Nature Reviews Clean Technology, 1(2), 114-114. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44359-025-00022-8
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill.
Finkbeiner, M. (2014). The international standards as the constitution of life cycle assessment: the ISO 14040 series and its offspring. In M. Finkbeiner (Ed.), Background and future prospects in life cycle assessment (pp. 85-106). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8697-3_3
International Organization for Standardization. (2006). Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines (ISO 14044: 2006). Author.
Rezaee, E., & Silva, S. R. P. (2026). Solar energy in 2025: Global deployment, cost trends, and the role of energy storage in enabling a resilient smart energy infrastructure. Energy & Environmental Materials, 9(3), e70199. https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.70199
Gatti, S. (2023). Project finance in theory and practice: designing, structuring, and financing private and public projects (3rd ed.). Elsevier.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
The data that support this study findings are available upon reasonable request addressed to the corresponding author
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Meyo Otieno Omondi George, Nderu John, Lucas Mogaka Ongondo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal the right to publish it under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This allows for maximum dissemination and reuse with appropriate citation.
ORCID 
